{"id":14537,"date":"2025-03-23T10:58:20","date_gmt":"2025-03-23T03:58:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bitcoinvn.io\/news\/?p=14537"},"modified":"2026-06-06T11:10:15","modified_gmt":"2026-06-06T04:10:15","slug":"banning-tether","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bitcoinvn.io\/insights\/banning-tether\/","title":{"rendered":"Banning Tether would undermine US Dollar\u2019s Reserve Currency Status"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Tom Howard, Head of Financial Products and Regulatory Affairs at CoinList<\/em><\/p>\n

The Stablecoin Act, as currently drafted, would effectively ban Tether from the US market due to its offshore operations.<\/p>\n

This approach is a major policy error.<\/p>\n

A robust global reserve currency thrives by exporting itself to foreign markets, not by pulling it back home.<\/p>\n

Tether\u2019s dominance in the stablecoin market proves there is substantial global demand for USD-denominated stablecoins that operate independently of US banks.<\/p>\n

\"Tether<\/p>\n

Offshore stablecoins like Tether increase global demand for the USD by facilitating offshore transactions and offshore bank reserves of USD, reinforcing the US dollar\u2019s international prominence.<\/p>\n

Tether\u2019s success proves there is substantial global demand for USD-denominated stablecoins that operate independently of US banks, and this demand will not disappear through domestic regulation.<\/p>\n

Attempting to force all USD-denominated stablecoins to reshore deposits to US banks ignores a critical monetary principle known as \u201cTriffin\u2019s dilemma,\u201d which describes how exporting currency overseas strengthens international demand but risks domestic inflation if too much of that currency returns home.<\/p>\n

Here’s why banning offshore-issued stablecoins would backfire:<\/p>\n

Inflation Risks:<\/strong> If forced to relocate reserves to US institutions, Tether would import significant volumes of USD back into the US, potentially exacerbating domestic inflation. Meanwhile, international demand for offshore USD tokens would persist, prompting competitors to quickly fill Tether\u2019s void overseas.<\/p>\n

Reduced USD Liquidity Globally:<\/strong> If Tether opts to remain overseas to retain customers, the US ban would severely reduce its liquidity against the dollar. This harms users through increased transaction costs and weakens global demand for USD.<\/p>\n

\"Mohammed<\/p>\n

Geopolitical Risks:<\/strong> A proposed ban could unintentionally drive Tether and other foreign-issued stablecoins into strategic partnerships with nations actively seeking to undermine USD dominance. China is already actively developing financial alternatives to the USD, as demonstrated by recent deals like the Saudi $100B USD-denominated bond backed by RMB. This highlights an urgent, real-world risk.<\/p>\n

A Better Path Forward:<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Amending the Stablecoin Act to create exemptions for foreign-issued stablecoins would avoid these pitfalls. Allow these stablecoins to operate, trade, and be utilized within the US, but clearly label them as unregistered, higher-risk alternatives compared to fully US-regulated stablecoins. Empower the US-registered stablecoins to have benefits commensurate with their reduced risks.<\/p>\n

Such an exemption:<\/p>\n